| | ||
![]() | | |
| | ||
| Home | Classified Ads | Gallery | Join the Club | Register on the Forum | Merchandise | Supporting Vendors | Chat | ||
| | #31 (permalink) |
| Powered By Eaton! | I cant answer that question. Detonation has alot of factors. IAT2 Temp, Load, Timing, Fuel, Air/Fuel, compression ratio, etc... Wayne
__________________ ![]() 2003 F-150 FX4 Powered by 2003 Lightning Engine #2005 AFCO H/E With Fans, Killer Chiller, Ported Throttle Body, Ported Plenum, Ported C&L Elbow, Metco Idlers, 4# Lower Pulley, Bosch 255LPH Fuel Pump, 90MM MAF, NGK TR6, FTVB K&N Filter, EGR Delete, Flex-A-Lite EFans, 170* T-Stat, JLP Street Reseroir Tuned By Wes @ Total Performance Solutions 331RWHP/411RWTQ On 38's Best 1/4 14.569@ 90.84MPH Best 60' 2.08 |
| | |
| | #32 (permalink) | |
| Turbo Power | Quote:
Rich | |
| | |
| | #34 (permalink) | |
| CORNFED Paid Member | Quote:
As for the tune: When you have you tune to run an 11.712 on non-ethanol fuels and put in E10 your wideband will read a little leaner. Somewhere around 12 to 1 (depends on the actual blend of ethanol to gasoline in the E10--the reason why the signs say up to 10%). If you plan on using only ethanol blended fuels, then tune your wideband to read the same AFR as you would use for straight gasoline; i.e. 11.712 AFR reading on your wideband. It will take a couple % more fuel to achieve the same reading on your wideband. To explain using your example above, you have a gasoline tune with an AFR of 11.712 at WOT. Now you retune to the ethanol blend fuel to achieve an AFR of 11.264. Now instead of adding 4% more fuel to maintain your AFR of 11.712, you added 8% more fuel and essentially richened up the tune and killed a little power. Last edited by lightningkylej; 02-19-2009 at 12:51 PM.. | |
| | |
| | #37 (permalink) |
| 99 2.3L KB-R Paid Member | do you know what the numbers are for unleaded 91 octane e10? That's the best i can get where i live.
__________________ 99 black Lightning 2.3L Kenne Bell with a ton of bolt-ons, and stock motor 496/620 on Mustang dyno.12.786@104.495 8.15@85.601 FL6U3.2TWPEMVIJXZ 1991 Ford Probe GT 1/4mile: 12.02@108mph 12.06@118mph |
| | |
| | #38 (permalink) | |
| CORNFED Paid Member | Quote:
Here in Oklahoma, we have ethanol blended fuels with up to 10% ethanol but only 91 octane, however, it is not the best fuel nor is the non-ethanol fuels we have around here. That is why I run E85 and just take the hit on fuel economy. | |
| | |
| | #39 (permalink) |
| 99 2.3L KB-R Paid Member | What all would a guy have to do to convert and run e85? anything special a guy needs or is it just a matter of pumping more fuel in to compensate for the extra ethonal? Our pumps claim 91 octane with the e10. I have a predator tuner, and my maf extender is only on number 2 right now. I think I have 50lb injectors running a 2.3l kb. Can a guy make more power with a good tune on e 85? I would assume so beings it has a higher octane rating.
__________________ 99 black Lightning 2.3L Kenne Bell with a ton of bolt-ons, and stock motor 496/620 on Mustang dyno.12.786@104.495 8.15@85.601 FL6U3.2TWPEMVIJXZ 1991 Ford Probe GT 1/4mile: 12.02@108mph 12.06@118mph |
| | |
| | #40 (permalink) |
| Registered User | Great discussion! I do have a couple things to add that may make everyone's life a little easier. It's really, really wise to get a wideband that also reads Lambda. That way you don't ever have to worry about doing some kind of conversion. Because no matter what fuel you are running, the stoich point will always be Lambda 1.0 - and you'll always know that your target lambda will be right. For instance if you are targeting an 11.5 A/F ratio and you want the equivalent A/F ratio with an alcohol fuel, all you do is log Lambda on the meter and look for around 0.79 Lambda and all will be good. As mentioned the 02 sensor doesn't 'care' about A/F ratio - putting it simply it's 'native' language is lambda. The A/F readings you see are based on internal calculations done within the wideband which you a reading for gasoline. The other thing to consider is, as mentioned, E85, ain't always E85 - in fact here in Ohio, it varies by season, so you may get E60, E70 or maybe E92 sometimes. You never know. And virtually ALL gas nowadays is at least E10, sometimes it's posted on the pump, sometimes it's not. To be really sure, and on a vehicle tuned on the edge, I always use Zeitronix's new nifty tool - an Ethanol content analyzer - you have to also buy a flex fuel sensor, but it works really well and is a must here up north. Hope this helps, Don LaSota |
| | |
| | #41 (permalink) |
| Registered User | i'm back to ask another question. So when i was tuned, using mostly sunoco 93 in the tank, maybe a bit of ultra 94, all "up to 10% ethanol" my a/f was left at 11.7ish. back home when i am racing, using only ultra 94 "with up to 10% ethanol" i have datalogged my a/f at just over 12, sometimes 12.2, but can vary each race from 11.6-12.2 during a sinlge pass, and some passes it stays below 12 on the same night. basically what i'm asking is should i be worried, or re-tuning for a bit lower of an a/f? Sean |
| | |
| | #42 (permalink) | |
| CORNFED Paid Member | Quote:
I haven't had a change to strap it back on the dyno to see what the before and after is. However, I have seen turbo cars pick up 10% more power with the E-85 conversion, with the timing and target AFR the SAME! (600 whp 2.0L on 110 to 660 whp on E85). That being said, if you are comparing the max safe power on pump gas with the max safe power on E85, then yes you can make alot more power. At the least, compare the E85 to leaded race fuels for a power comparison. More boost, timing, and a leaner AFR all means more power and is very dooable on E85. | |
| | |
| | #43 (permalink) | |
| CORNFED Paid Member | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #44 (permalink) | |
| CORNFED Paid Member | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #45 (permalink) | |
| Registered User | Quote:
when i hooked up my a/f ratio gauge, and when i was tuned, the air fuel gauge was never changed for the fuel i was using, the "up to 10% ethanol" ultra 94. we just hooked it up and changed the configuration in the computer and went for a few test runs to obtain an a/f of 11.7. so would my a/f have been wrong from the start and will me tune be off then? i'm sure this was already stated, but how do i go about making sure i have the right a/f reading on my gauge for the fuel i am using. Sean | |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |