Is this forum and the NLOC website now slower?

[Patrick]

Microsoft Windows 2000 [Version 5.00.2195]
(C) Copyright 1985-2000 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\expc-1>tracert nloc.net

Tracing route to nloc.net [208.100.8.12]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 9 ms 9 ms 9 ms adsl-63-203-141-89.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.20
3.141.89]
2 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms dist4-vlan50.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [67.114.50.2]

3 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms bb2-g9-0.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [151.164.92.196]
4 11 ms 10 ms 11 ms 151.164.93.167
5 10 ms 11 ms 20 ms bpr2-ge-2-1-0.LosAngelesEquinix.savvis.net [151.
164.248.214]
6 12 ms 11 ms 12 ms cr2-pos-0-0-3-0.lay.savvis.net [204.70.203.50]
7 70 ms 70 ms 71 ms cr2-tengig-0-0-5-0.chicago.savvis.net [204.70.19
5.117]
8 71 ms 71 ms 70 ms ber2-tengigabitethernet-3-1.chicagoequinix.savvi
s.net [204.70.195.118]
9 72 ms 72 ms 71 ms 208.173.176.218
10 70 ms 71 ms 70 ms ip60.216-86-149.static.steadfast.net [216.86.149
.60]
11 74 ms 74 ms 74 ms web.nloc.net [208.100.8.12]

Trace complete.

Looks somewhat better?

[Silver_2000]

Originally Posted by Patrick

Microsoft Windows 2000 [Version 5.00.2195]
(C) Copyright 1985-2000 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\expc-1>tracert nloc.net

Tracing route to nloc.net [208.100.8.12]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 9 ms 9 ms 9 ms adsl-63-203-141-89.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.20
3.141.89]
2 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms dist4-vlan50.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [67.114.50.2]

3 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms bb2-g9-0.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [151.164.92.196]
4 11 ms 10 ms 11 ms 151.164.93.167
5 10 ms 11 ms 20 ms bpr2-ge-2-1-0.LosAngelesEquinix.savvis.net [151.
164.248.214]
6 12 ms 11 ms 12 ms cr2-pos-0-0-3-0.lay.savvis.net [204.70.203.50]
7 70 ms 70 ms 71 ms cr2-tengig-0-0-5-0.chicago.savvis.net [204.70.19
5.117]
8 71 ms 71 ms 70 ms ber2-tengigabitethernet-3-1.chicagoequinix.savvi
s.net [204.70.195.118]
9 72 ms 72 ms 71 ms 208.173.176.218
10 70 ms 71 ms 70 ms ip60.216-86-149.static.steadfast.net [216.86.149
.60]
11 74 ms 74 ms 74 ms web.nloc.net [208.100.8.12]

Trace complete.

Looks somewhat better?

Our Host stated that anything under 80 ms coming out of California was considered good
Must be all those .coms sucking up all the bandwidth

[Patrick]

Guess it's CA users, but the site is sure slower now.
Have to live with it I know, but it's kinda strange going backwards in the electronic world.

[Silver_2000]

with no details I cant try to help

run a pathping and post the results
click start then run then cmd then hit enter
type
pathping nloc.net
then wait the 5 min or so for it to complete and post the results

[blackluster]

So is there anything I can do to make it faster?

[Silver_2000]

Originally Posted by blackluster

So is there anything I can do to make it faster?

THe issue is in the route from some ISPs to te server

In order to try to figure out what needs to be done if anything I need tracerts and pathpings to be posted

[SLVRLTNG]

Doug,
it still has it's moments here also..been slower the last couple of days

running pathping now

C:\Documents and Settings\JR>pathping nloc.net

Tracing route to nloc.net [208.100.8.12]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
0 JRlaptop.domain_not_set.invalid [192.168.1.65]
1 * * *
Computing statistics for 25 seconds...
Source to Here This Node/Link
Hop RTT Lost/Sent = Pct Lost/Sent = Pct Address
0 JRlaptop.domain_not_set.invalid [1
92.168.1.65]
100/ 100 =100% |
1 --- 100/ 100 =100% 0/ 100 = 0% JRlaptop [0.0.0.0]

Trace complete.

[Patrick]

OK, here we go, (and thanks for trying to help out);
Microsoft Windows [Version 6.0.6000]
Copyright (c) 2006 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

C:\Users\Bruce Patrick>pathping nloc.net

Tracing route to nloc.net [208.100.8.12]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
0 HP [192.168.0.3]
1 cpe-76-87-219-50.socal.res.rr.com [76.87.219.50]
2 10.33.64.1
3 gig2-3.wmnsca2-rtr2.socal.rr.com [24.30.162.177]
4 SRP1-1.GDGVCA1-GSR2.socal.rr.com [24.30.162.66]
5 tge4-1-0.tustca1-rtr1.socal.rr.com [24.30.162.235]
6 te-4-1.car1.Tustin1.Level3.net [4.71.104.157]
7 ae-2-3.bar1.Tustin1.Level3.net [4.69.132.218]
8 ae-0-11.bar2.Tustin1.Level3.net [4.69.136.198]
9 * ae-10-10.ebr1.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.69.136.206]
10 ae-91-91.csw4.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.69.136.134]
11 * * ae-92-92.ebr2.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.69.136.149]
12 ae-2.ebr1.Denver1.Level3.net [4.69.132.105]
13 ae-1-100.ebr2.Denver1.Level3.net [4.69.132.38]
14 ae-3.ebr3.Chicago1.Level3.net [4.69.132.62]
15 ae-78.ebr2.Chicago1.Level3.net [4.69.134.61]
16 ae-24-56.car4.Chicago1.Level3.net [4.68.101.168]
17 WBS-CONNECT.car4.Chicago1.Level3.net [4.79.208.154]
18 web.nloc.net [208.100.8.12]

Computing statistics for 450 seconds...
Source to Here This Node/Link
Hop RTT Lost/Sent = Pct Lost/Sent = Pct Address
0 HP [192.168.0.3]
0/ 100 = 0% |
1 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% cpe-76-87-219-50.socal.res.rr.com
[76.87.219.50]
0/ 100 = 0% |
2 11ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% 10.33.64.1
0/ 100 = 0% |
3 10ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% gig2-3.wmnsca2-rtr2.socal.rr.com [
24.30.162.177]
0/ 100 = 0% |
4 11ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% SRP1-1.GDGVCA1-GSR2.socal.rr.com [
24.30.162.66]
0/ 100 = 0% |
5 13ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% tge4-1-0.tustca1-rtr1.socal.rr.com
[24.30.162.235]
0/ 100 = 0% |
6 20ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% te-4-1.car1.Tustin1.Level3.net [4.
71.104.157]
0/ 100 = 0% |
7 50ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% ae-2-3.bar1.Tustin1.Level3.net [4.
69.132.218]
0/ 100 = 0% |
8 54ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% ae-0-11.bar2.Tustin1.Level3.net [4
.69.136.198]
0/ 100 = 0% |
9 56ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% ae-10-10.ebr1.Dallas1.Level3.net [
4.69.136.206]
0/ 100 = 0% |
10 55ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% ae-91-91.csw4.Dallas1.Level3.net [
4.69.136.134]
0/ 100 = 0% |
11 54ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% ae-92-92.ebr2.Dallas1.Level3.net [
4.69.136.149]
0/ 100 = 0% |
12 60ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% ae-2.ebr1.Denver1.Level3.net [4.69
.132.105]
0/ 100 = 0% |
13 64ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% ae-1-100.ebr2.Denver1.Level3.net [
4.69.132.38]
0/ 100 = 0% |
14 90ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% ae-3.ebr3.Chicago1.Level3.net [4.6
9.132.62]
0/ 100 = 0% |
15 84ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% ae-78.ebr2.Chicago1.Level3.net [4.
69.134.61]
0/ 100 = 0% |
16 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% ae-24-56.car4.Chicago1.Level3.net
[4.68.101.168]
0/ 100 = 0% |
17 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% WBS-CONNECT.car4.Chicago1.Level3.n
et [4.79.208.154]
0/ 100 = 0% |
18 81ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% web.nloc.net [208.100.8.12]

Trace complete.

C:\Users\Bruce Patrick>

[Patrick]

Did you do something, or am I just "lucky" right now? Seems faster.

[bgstew6]

luck

[Patrick]

Originally Posted by bgstew6

luck

Hey Stew...
Yup, it's the same, slow most of the time.
Not being a Complainer, just what it is. Sorry for it being a problem.

[bgstew6]

LOL mines been uber slow since the move as well....

[Silver_2000]

Im trying to see what can be done to fix it

AT this point it appears that its a problem with a few routers between the west coast and the server

Since its not slow for me I am unable to provide the tech support folks at the Host or at the ISPs any data - It would be VERY helpful if you guys could post the results of tracerts or pathpings when the server is slow

we have to provide the datacenter with DATA

[Patrick]

Microsoft Windows 2000 [Version 5.00.2195]
(C) Copyright 1985-2000 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\expc-1>pathping nloc.net

Tracing route to nloc.net [208.100.8.12]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
0 expc-1 [192.168.1.105]
1 adsl-63-203-141-89.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.203.141.89]
2 dist4-vlan50.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [67.114.50.2]
3 bb2-g9-0.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [151.164.92.196]
4 151.164.93.167
5 bpr2-ge-2-1-0.LosAngelesEquinix.savvis.net [151.164.248.214]
6 cr2-pos-0-0-3-0.lay.savvis.net [204.70.203.50]
7 cr2-pos-0-7-3-3.chicago.savvis.net [208.172.3.81]
8 ber2-tengigabitethernet-3-1.chicagoequinix.savvis.net [204.70.195.118]
9 208.173.176.218
10 ip60.216-86-149.static.steadfast.net [216.86.149.60]
11 web.nloc.net [208.100.8.12]

Computing statistics for 275 seconds...
Source to Here This Node/Link
Hop RTT Lost/Sent = Pct Lost/Sent = Pct Address
0 expc-1 [192.168.1.105]
0/ 100 = 0% |
1 9ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% adsl-63-203-141-89.dsl.lsan03.pacb
ell.net [63.203.141.89]
0/ 100 = 0% |
2 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% dist4-vlan50.irvnca.sbcglobal.net
[67.114.50.2]
0/ 100 = 0% |
3 9ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% bb2-g9-0.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [151
.164.92.196]
0/ 100 = 0% |
4 10ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% 151.164.93.167
0/ 100 = 0% |
5 13ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% bpr2-ge-2-1-0.LosAngelesEquinix.sa
vvis.net [151.164.248.214]
0/ 100 = 0% |
6 106ms 6/ 100 = 6% 6/ 100 = 6% cr2-pos-0-0-3-0.lay.savvis.net [20
4.70.203.50]
0/ 100 = 0% |
7 137ms 5/ 100 = 5% 5/ 100 = 5% cr2-pos-0-7-3-3.chicago.savvis.net
[208.172.3.81]
0/ 100 = 0% |
8 75ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% ber2-tengigabitethernet-3-1.chicag
oequinix.savvis.net [204.70.195.118]
0/ 100 = 0% |
9 82ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% 208.173.176.218
0/ 100 = 0% |
10 80ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% ip60.216-86-149.static.steadfast.n
et [216.86.149.60]
0/ 100 = 0% |
11 70ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% web.nloc.net [208.100.8.12]

Trace complete.

C:\Documents and Settings\expc-1>^A

[Silver_2000]

Originally Posted by Patrick

Microsoft Windows 2000 [Version 5.00.2195]
(C) Copyright 1985-2000 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\expc-1>pathping nloc.net


Trace complete.

C:\Documents and Settings\expc-1>^A

great - can you do a ping and a tracert as well ?- It seems that dist4-vlan50.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [67.114.50.2] is losing data