View Single Post
Old 03-20-2008, 01:38 PM   #62 (permalink)
Silver_2000
Former Lightning Owner
Paid Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Carrollton TX
Posts: 565
NLOC member #: 688
View this user's gallery
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick View Post
Microsoft Windows 2000 [Version 5.00.2195]
(C) Copyright 1985-2000 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\expc-1>tracert nloc.net

Tracing route to nloc.net [208.100.8.12]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 9 ms 9 ms 9 ms adsl-63-203-141-89.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.20
3.141.89]
2 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms dist4-vlan50.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [67.114.50.2]

3 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms bb2-g9-0.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [151.164.92.196]
4 11 ms 10 ms 11 ms 151.164.93.167
5 10 ms 11 ms 20 ms bpr2-ge-2-1-0.LosAngelesEquinix.savvis.net [151.
164.248.214]
6 12 ms 11 ms 12 ms cr2-pos-0-0-3-0.lay.savvis.net [204.70.203.50]
7 70 ms 70 ms 71 ms cr2-tengig-0-0-5-0.chicago.savvis.net [204.70.19
5.117]
8 71 ms 71 ms 70 ms ber2-tengigabitethernet-3-1.chicagoequinix.savvi
s.net [204.70.195.118]
9 72 ms 72 ms 71 ms 208.173.176.218
10 70 ms 71 ms 70 ms ip60.216-86-149.static.steadfast.net [216.86.149
.60]
11 74 ms 74 ms 74 ms web.nloc.net [208.100.8.12]

Trace complete.

Looks somewhat better?
Our Host stated that anything under 80 ms coming out of California was considered good
Must be all those .coms sucking up all the bandwidth
Silver_2000 is offline